Announcements - Siteflex

print page
Siteflex Announcements RSS Feed

Announcements

 
  • Free Siteflex Training now available to all Siteflex users

    Tweet This

    22 December, 2010

    Beginning late January, we will commence our 2011 calendar of free scheduled group training sessions in addition to more personalised private training.

    We offer training sessions that can help new members of the Siteflex family, experienced users who want to learn about the latest features and also those who need a quick refresh of the capabilities of Siteflex.

    Check out the new Siteflex Training page to book your place now.

  • Moving away from Flash - No offense, Adobe

    Tweet This

    16 December, 2010

    In the early days of Siteflex development, a few of our standard components started out as Flash-based extensions to the core Siteflex system. At the time these Flash-based solutions were the best choice for an attractive, cross-browser compatible way of getting the sexy results we wanted for our users and websites. In the subsequent years, however, technology has moved on.
     

    Moving on.

    Today there are some amazing, standards-based solutions freely* available; solutions able to obtain similar results to those that previously required Flash to achieve. Recently we've put in some time into moving away from our original Flash-based solutions in favour of these newer standards-based solutions.

    While it's true that we are (mostly) big fans of the iPhone around the office, what we are really looking forward to is the greater amount of standards-based customisation we'll be able to achieve with the new methods. After all, we're not primarily Flash developers! But more than that, standards-based web development is what the web craves.

    We have begun moving towards better custom-font technologies (Cufon, Font-Face CSS3) and have already phased out SWFir Image Replacement technology. In addition to these, two standard components are being phased out in favour of these new Siteflex components. Let's take a look at these updated components below.
     

    Galleriffic for Siteflex Photo Galleries  

    Replacing our old Flash-based SimpleViewer Photo Galleries, the new jQuery-based Galleriffic Photo Galleries allow a much greater level of customisation in the layout and appearance of Siteflex Photo Galleries. Not to mention they'll look better when embedding into a website's template.

    We're also looking into ways of displaying photos (via Galleriffic) better on mobile devices specifically - looking forward to seeing some great results in 2011.
     

    Nivo Slider for Siteflex Banner Management

    Replacing all old Flash-based Image Sliders, the new jQuery-based Nivo Slider allows Siteflex Banner Management to directly interact with the Image Slider functions for an easier time managing it's display.

    The Nivo Slider has already been rolled out to many Siteflex websites, often acting as the primary visual element on the homepage of these sites.
     

    Still a place in our heart...

    While Flash certainly has it's place in the online space, the Siteflex team is looking forward to moving further away from it with our standard Siteflex components. With HTML5 able to play video content without the aid of Flash (for example), a Flash-free Siteflex website will become more and more commonplace as we move into the next stage of what it means to be online.

    * - Some solutions aren't actually free.

  • Login: Remember Me, Remember Me Not

    Tweet This

    8 December, 2010

    We've been looking into adding Remember Me functionality to Siteflex login boxes across our websites. Having an option to remember a user's credentials encourages repeat visits and the use of a website's login-required functions.

    However, is that really the best way to go about things? There are a few schools of thought on the topic. Let's have a look at the four main options and their associated risk vs usability...
     

    1. No Remember Me box, logged in by default. Users remain logged in unless they specifically logout, always! No need for a Remember Me box. Come on, it's 2010!

      Pros: Given ideal conditions and not completely sensitive data this is ideal for usability, with the user experience being seemless and no additional options to consider when logging in.

      Cons: However, sometimes logout buttons can be hard to find, glanced over or not even considered. We've observed that many users (especially those without much technical experience) expect that closing the browser window will end their session and log them out, which isn't the case here.

      This option opens up a higher level of risk of a user's personal data being accessed by unwanted parties, becoming a risk in situations such as logging in on public computers.

       
    2. Remember Me box, ticked by default.

      Pros: The next best thing to the above is allowing an opt-out on this default behaviour. This is great because the majority of users, we have observed, use the Remember Me functionality where it is available and where it actually works (I'm looking at you, Twitter).

      Cons: Is this really the default beahaviour you want for ALL users? Those users without too much technical experience are unlikely to change any of the options presented to them, and these are often the exact users you will want to untick the Remember Me box.

      Users that do not want the website to remember their details must tick the box each time they login, although this can be managed via a browser cookie (assuming they are enabled). Thought required, slowing down the user experience.

       

    3. Remember Me box, not ticked by default.

      Pros: Allows anyone that knows and can accept the consequences to opt-in to the website remembering their details. The responsibility is now on the user to be aware of their situation (ie. if they are using a public computer). For those users who aren't sure, they are unlikely to change the default option presented.

      This option also mirrors our own thoughts on Mailout or Newsletter subscriptions being an opt-in rather than an opt-out, an approach we generally take with the Siteflex Mail module.

      Cons: We've observed that the majority of users opt-in to Remember Me, so overall this is a backwards step for usability. Thought required, slowing down the user experience.


       
    4. No Remember Me box, logged out by default.

      Pros: The most secure option, since there is no additional option for remembering details. The responsibility of remembering login details then relies completely on the browser or third-party applications - which still applies to all of the above situations additionally. No additional user interface options to confuse / slow down the experience. No additional security risk.

      Cons: Usability is diminished for a majority of users who want this functionality. Mass chaos with people using the Retrieve Password function on a weekly basis. Cats and dogs living together! etc.

      Due to lessened usability, user behaviour results in using passwords they've used on other websites more often, decreasing security further.
       


    Currently Siteflex sits at option 4, the most secure option, with consideration of moving to option 3. Do you agree? Let us know in the comments below! As a lot of the time the best option is dependant on the site's content itself, we could potentially allow each of four options be available on a site by site basis.

    ...the high risk for the few outweighs the minimal gain of the many.

    Of course when it comes to securing personal detail it often comes down to a certain level of caution from the user themselves. Unattended computer terminals, stolen laptops (and, increasingly, smart phones) will remain an issue no matter the website's chosen approach to helping users better access their personal details.

    Australian J-Award Winner Tame Impala weigh in on the issue below with a sweet lick.

     

    Some further reading for the extra keen:

     

  • Siteflex wants YOU... to work on it later - Introducing the Drafts list

    Tweet This

    18 October, 2010

    Repeated discussion amongst the Siteflex Team has resulted in a tidy piece of process-driven functionality today. Introducing the Drafts list for Siteflex Pages.

     

    What does it mean?

     

    For quite some time Siteflex Pages have had one of three possible status settings; Online, Draft and Offline. There has been little difference between Offline and Draft, with the Draft status acting mainly as an internal process for some Siteflex administrators. Now, there is a point!

    Whoa, that's so intense!

    The Drafts list in Siteflex Pages acts as a "to do" list; an active, visible reminder about Pages you and your colleagues are currently working on getting live. It's a shortcut that makes it easy to quickly jump in and continue authoring your content.

     

    It's so beautiful!

     

    Encourage not only yourself but your collegues to get your content finalised and live on your Siteflex website. Your website will thank you for it!

     

    Too much!

     

    There are more plans on the horizon for Draft status, with greater Draft content visibility for all Siteflex modules, helping make it easier to keep track of what you should be working on in Siteflex.

    Didn't get the double rainbow reference? Watch it here.

    Drafts list for Siteflex Pages is now available to all Siteflex users. Enjoy the new possibilities!

Page 6 of 19
2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10